MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386537729 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad137.449

P21.07.B THE LHSC/WESTERN BRAIN TUMOUR TISSUE BANK: A GLOBAL RESOURCE

2023· article· en· W4386537729 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Megyesi, Rui Wang, Morris F. White, Adrianna Ranger, David A. Ramsay, Q Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTissue bankBrain tissueMedicinePathologyTumour tissueInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND A brain tumour tissue bank can serve as an important source of tissue for neuro-oncology research. The London Health Sciences (LHSC) / Western Brain Tumour Tissue Bank (BTTB) provides high-quality brain tumour tissue specimens that are used globally for neuro-oncology research. The LHSC / Western BTTB was established approximately 35 years ago. The objectives of this study were to: 1) establish an up-to-date accounting of the brain tumour specimens in the BTTB; 2) compare the quality control measures used to assess specimen quality against those used in other comparable tissue banks; 3) determine the scope of tissue distribution globally. MATERIAL AND METHODS The records of the BTTB were reviewed with the assistance of the BTTB coordinator. Number and type of brain tumour specimens were recorded. The quality control measures used in the BTTB were compared with the published literature. The location of laboratories to which brain tumour tissue had been distributed was determined. RESULTS Since 1995 there have been 1536 adult brain tumour specimens collected in the BTTB. There are approximately 3 vials per case, not including paraffin blocks. This includes 713 primary intra-axial central nervous system tumours, 229 meningeal tumours, and 285 metastatic tumours. Since 1995 there have been 223 pediatric brain tumour specimens collected in the BTTB. This includes 53 pilocytic astrocytomas, 32 medulloblastomas, and 27 ependymomas. The quality control measures used in the BTTB appear to exceed those used by other brain tumour tissue banks as determined by literature review. The BTTB has sent tissue specimens to neuro-oncology laboratories around the globe and numerous publications have resulted from experiments using the brain tumour tissue supplied by the BTTB. CONCLUSION The LHSC / Western BTTB has collected a large and diverse number of high quality brain tumour specimens since its founding. It serves as a global resource, and the supplied tissue has led to many research publications in neuro-oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2740.230

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207