PL02.3.A NRG ONCOLOGY STUDY BN007: RANDOMIZED PHASE II/III TRIAL OF IPILIMIUMAB (IPI) PLUS NIVOLUMAB (NIVO) VS. TEMOZOLOMIDE (TMZ) IN MGMT-UNMETHYLATED (UMGMT) NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA (NGBM)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND New therapies are especially needed for uMGMT nGBM. NRG Oncology BN002 (phase I) demonstrated safety and preliminary efficacy of Ipi+Nivo for nGBM, leading to BN007 as phase II/III. METHODS Adults with uMGMT nGBM (WHO 2016) and KPS ≥ 70 were randomized to RT and concurrent and adjuvant Ipi+Nivo or TMZ, stratified by glioma-recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA), intent to use tumor-treating fields (NCT04396860). Phase II primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), powered 95% to detect a hazard ratio (HR) ≤0.58 with 1-sided 0.15 significance after 100 events. If p<0.15, then phase III would accrue with overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint. Corticosteroids were disallowed at Ipi+Nivo start. Histology, biomarkers, and PFS were assessed centrally. RESULTS Among 374 patients screened, 159 were randomized in phase II (79 Ipi+Nivo, 80 TMZ). Demographics (age median 60 years, range 28-79; male 66%, white 88%, not Hispanic/Latino 89%), KPS (90-100 61%), extent of resection (gross total 65% per local PI), and RPA (III 10%, IV 73%, V 17%) were well-balanced between arms. After 100 PFS events, the pre-planned phase II analysis demonstrated no improvement for Ipi+Nivo vs. TMZ [median 7.7 (95% CI: 6.5, 8.5) vs. 8.5 (95% CI: 7.1, 10.4) months; HR 1.47 (95% CI: 0.98-2.2); 1-sided p=0.96]. OS is immature (>50% alive, 13.7 months median follow-up) but without observed difference between arms [median ~13 months each; HR 0.95 (95% CI: 0.61-1.49); 1-sided p=0.36]. On the Ipi+Nivo arm, treatment-related grade 3, 4, and 5 events were reported in 26 (33.3%), 4 (5.1%), and 2 (2.6%; colitis and autoimmune disorder, n=1 each) patients. CONCLUSION Ipi+Nivo did not improve PFS for uMGMT nGBM. Accrual permanently closed after phase II. No new safety signals were identified. Molecular analyses and survival follow-up are ongoing. Funded by NCI Grants U10CA180868, U10CA180822, U24CA196067 (NRG Oncology Operations, SDMC, Specimen Bank).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".