MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386545527 · doi:10.2147/nds.s412893

Effectiveness of Quadruple Fortified Salt Compared to Double and Single Fortified Salts in Improving Haemoglobin Levels Among Moderately Anemic Women Aged 18–49 Years in Rural Low Resource Setting: Randomized Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4386545527 on OpenAlexafffund
Paschal Mdoe, Venkatesh Mannar, Museveni Justine, Godfrey Guga, Rose Gadiye, Vincent Assey, Caroline Kimathi, F. Chermiti Ben Abdallah, John Paschal, Estomih Mduma, Levente L. Diósady

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition and Dietary Supplements · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialFortificationMedicineClinical trialPediatricsInternal medicineFood scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Micronutrients (iron, iodine, vitamin B12 and folate) deficiency is prevalent globally affecting more than two billion people majority being from low- and middle-income countries. Women of reproductive age are in an increased risk of iron deficiency. About 29.4% of women aged 15– 49 years worldwide are estimated to be affected by iron deficiency. Food fortification with micronutrients is important in addressing micronutrients deficiency. Aim: To evaluate if the quadruple fortified with iodine, iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid (QFS), will be more effective in improving the hemoglobin level of women aged 18 to 49 years compared to the double fortified with iodine and iron (DFS) and iodized salt in rural Tanzania. Methods: A double-blinded three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted between July 2020 and December 2021 at the Haydom Lutheran Hospital catchment area. We randomized women aged 18– 49 years with haemoglobin between 8 and 12 g/dl who were neither pregnant nor lactating into three groups 55 Iodized salts (IS), 57 Double fortified salt (DFS), and 57 quadruple fortified salt (QFS). The participants used study salt for 10 months. Results: Over the ten months of use of study salts, the overall mean haemoglobin level of women was significantly higher in QFS by 0.43g/dl compared to IS. The ferritin levels were significantly higher in QFS and DFS by 9.60ng/mL and 9.09ng/mL, respectively, compared to IS. Vitamin B12 was insignificantly higher in QFS by 52.19pg/mL compared to DFS, and folate concentration were insignificantly higher in QFS by 7.57nmoL/L and 4.51nmoL/L compared to DFS and IS groups, respectively. Conclusion: Salt fortification with iron, iodine, folate, and Vitamin B12 is feasible and has the potential to increase the serum ferritin, Vitamin B12 and folate levels with subsequent improvement of haemoglobin levels of individuals with relatively low haemoglobin. ClinicalTrial.org Number: NCT04404751. Keywords: iron-deficiency anemia, iodine, iron, vitamin B12, folate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition and Dietary SupplementsSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207