MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386554406 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad031

Obliterated Appendiceal Orifice with Sessile Serrated Lesion

2023· article· en· W4386554406 on OpenAlexaff
Nabeel Ahmed, Christine Orr, Sunil Patel, Robert Bechara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody orificeLesionAnatomyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 68-year-old female presented for surveillance colonoscopy. Her last colonoscopy was 5 years prior, during which two subcentimeter sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) were removed. During the current procedure, a polyp involving the appendiceal orifice was identified. This lesion measured approximately 1 cm, with an asymmetric shape and clouded surface. It was categorized as a Paris IIa and JNET 1 lesion consistent with SSL (fig. 1a–d). Interestingly, the appendiceal orifice appeared completely obliterated (fig. 1d). (a) White light exam. (b) Linked colour imaging exam. (c) Blue light imaging demonstrating JNET 1. (d) Obliterated appendiceal orifice. (e) Hematoxylin phloxine saffron stain: cross-section of appendix demonstrating fibrous obliteration. (f) Hematoxylin phloxine saffron stain: sessile serrated adenoma within the appendiceal lumen. Due to the uncertainty of ensuring clear deep margins, the patient underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy and cecectomy, which was successfully completed on an outpatient basis without complication. Final pathology indicated a completely excised non-dysplastic SSL (fig. 1f). Notably, on histologic examination, the appendiceal orifice was completely obliterated by fibrous tissue (fig. 1e). Although less common, polyps involving the appendiceal orifice have been previously described. However, this SSL involving the appendiceal orifice, which was also completely obliterated, is an exceptionally rare finding that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been described in the literature. Careful visualization of the appendiceal orifice on colonoscopy may lead to improved detection of appendiceal lesions, however, the significance of these lesions with regards to their malignant potential is uncertain. In a cohort of patients with serrated polyposis syndrome having undergone appendectomy, van Toledo et al. reported a 41.2 percent prevalence of appendiceal lesions with only 7.1 percent having been detected on previous colonoscopy.1 There was no funding associated with this manuscript. Robert Bechara is a consultant for Medtronic, Olympus, Pentax, Vantage, and Pendopharm. There are no data associated with this manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207