MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386558731 · doi:10.5272/jimab.2023293.5079

EFFECTS OF MLS-LASER ON NEUROPATHIC PAIN IN DIABETIC SENSОMOTOR NEUROPATHY

2023· article· en· W4386558731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lili Yosifova, Еvgеniyа Vlаdеvа, Mira Siderova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuropathic painDiabetic neuropathyMcGill Pain QuestionnaireVisual analogue scalePlaceboDiabetes mellitusPhysical therapyMoodAnesthesiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About 20-50 % of patients with diabetes and about 60 % of those with diabetic neuropathy develop neuropathic pain, which is characterized by tingling, burning, sharp, shooting, or stabbing sensations, and even electric shock-like sensations. Painful diabetic neuropathy can significantly affect the quality of life of patients with diabetes, the ability to perform daily activities and negatively affect mood. According to the 2021 consensus of an international panel of experts regarding the treatment of painful distal symmetric polyneuropathy, non-pharmacological forms of treatment should also be considered due to unsatisfactory pharmacotherapy. A number of studies have demonstrated the role of photobiomodulation as a non-pharmacological method of treating painful diabetic neuropathy. The purpose of this placebo-controlled, longitudinal study was to investigate the effect of high-energy MLS-laser therapy on neuropathic pain. Material and methods: A total of 69 cases of patients with type 2 diabetes and painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities were followed, divided into two groups: an experimental - 41 patients received high-energy laser radiation and a control (placebo) group - 28 patients, with a "mock" laser treatment. For objectification of pain, the Bulgarian version of the short form of the McGill pain questionnaire, version SF-MPQ-2, which includes the visual analog scale (VAS), was used. Comparisons between groups were performed with parametric or non parametric tests depending on the distribution of the variables, the number of the compared groups and the study pre test – post test design. Results: The pain index, reported by the McGill questionnaire, in the experimental group, decreased by - 63.2 % at the end of the nine-day treatment and by - 56.1 % at the 90th day after the start of treatment compared to the value before therapy. In the control group, there was a minimal change at the end of treatment (day 21), which did not persist until the end of the observation period (day 90). Conclusions: MLS laser therapy significantly increases the pain threshold and should be considered a safe, non-pharmacological adjunct to standard therapy in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)Same topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207