MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386561955 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v16n5p89

The Impact of the Continuing Education Program as a Sub-Program of the Ethics Kiosk Project on Sustainable Development on the Egyptian Society

2023· article· en· W4386561955 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nour-Elhouda Medhat Elgammal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumCronbach's alphaGeneral partnershipInteractive kioskQuality (philosophy)Sustainable developmentMedical educationPolitical scienceSociologyPublic relationsPedagogyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education is a fundamental pillar in societies and an essential factor in achieving the goals of sustainable development. However, poor areas and slums suffer from limited educational opportunities and a lack of quality education due to various factors. Many initiatives have been implemented to improve education in public schools. Among these initiatives is the continuing education program of the Ethics Kiosk Project, which is implemented by the Mishkat Nour Foundation in many Egyptian governorates. The continuing education program seeks to solve education problems in slums, specifically for children from 3 to 15 years old. This has been achieved by applying comprehensive and distinctive curricula such as the Cambridge Curriculum, providing support to public schools through the Public Schools Digital Ethics Kiosk System - ERP, implementing foundational curricula, qualifying and training teachers and conducting free remedial lessons in public schools. The continuing education program is the first of its kind in Egypt, which serves slums and poor areas, as hundreds of students, teachers, schools and centers have benefited from it. The researcher aimed to highlight these benefits. The study depends on a qualitative research method as a questionnaire and statistical methods including Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient and one-sample T-test. Findings revealed several positive impacts of the Cambridge curriculum application, including the quality of education, empowering teachers, strengthening the partnership between schools and families and a significant reduction in dropout rates which indicates the potential of the distinguished Curricula to address educational challenges and achieve sustainable development in slums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207