The Origin and Evolution of Tibetan Qingke Barley Based on Genome Sequencing Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tibetan Qingke barley is the main food of the Tibetans, which has been cultivated on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau for about 3 500 years. Tibetan Qingke barley is a variety of naked barley (Hordeum vulgare linn.var.nudum) belonging to the Hordeum of the family of Gramineae. With domestication and cultivation on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau for 3 500-4 000 years, it has been fully adapted to the extreme plateau climate. However, the origin and evolution of Tibetan Qingke barley has always been controversial at home and abroad. Tibetan Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, BGI and other research orgnizations made use of the genome sequencing data of 437 global barley germplasms including wild species, local varieties, and bred varieties to determine the origin and evolution of Tibetan Qingke barley through genetic analysis. The latest research showed that the Tibetan Qingke barley originated from the Eastern cultivated barley and entered southern Tibet through northern Pakistan, India and Nepal 3 500 years to 4 500 years ago. The low genetic diversity of Tibetan Qingke barley indicated that Tibet should be not the origin and evolution center of barley. Based on the haplotype of 5 major domestication genes of barley, it supported that six-row wild barley (H. agriocrithon) and Tibetan semi-wild barley originated from the wildification of cultivated barley or hybridization with wild barley, but did not support that the six-row wild barley (H. agriocrithon) is truly wild barley. Obviously, a large amount of sequencing data has answered the debate about the origin and evolution of the Tibetan Qingke barley at home and abroad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".