MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386569181 · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1292-6_8

Restoring Rice Paddies and Rice Agro-Ecosystem Services Through a Participatory Seed Conservation and Exchange Programme

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386569181 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Archana Bhatt, N. Anil Kumar, C Dhanya, P. Vipindas

Bibliographic record

VenueSatoyama initiative thematic review · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMultiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation
KeywordsAgricultureAgroforestryEcosystem servicesAgricultural biodiversityBiodiversityGeographyEcosystemPaddy fieldLivelihoodBusinessAgricultural scienceAgronomyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until the 1960s, Kerala, the southernmost state of India, was home to a rich diversity of cultivated traditional rice, expanding to more than 200 varieties. However, with subsequent agricultural intensification and a descending trend in paddy cultivation, the area witnessed a decline in this diversity, and cultivation had become limited to only a few selected varieties. This chapter discusses the efforts of the M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, MSSRF, in addressing the risks related to erosion of rice crop genetic diversity and the resultant weakened capacity of smallholder rice farming families to adapt to extreme weather variations. Interventions also addressed the growing issue of undernutrition amongst rice farmers of tribal communities in the Wayanad district of Kerala, South India. The intervention adopted a rice ecosystem-based adaptation approach (REbA) that combined ecological, social, and economic principles and integrated crop and soil biodiversity in the rice production system. The major component of the REbA was the Rice Seed Village (RSV) that fostered conservation, cultivation, and consumption of specialty rice varieties and protection of the ecosystem services of the rice agro-ecosystem. RSVs consisted of smallholder farm families engaged in on-farm conservation through cultivation of both improved traditional and modern paddy varieties. The major activity of RSVs was seed quality improvement for traditional rice diversity through training, seed exchange networks, and facilitating linkages amongst stakeholders. Training on yield enhancement, quality seed production, and successful seed storage, along with sensitisation in rice value chain development, enabled the RSV families to raise their income, recover or retain many of the traditional varieties, revive cultivation of rice-allied crops like legumes, bananas and leafy vegetables, and maintain several wild plant genetic resources associated with the rice agro-ecosystem. Through the RSVs, strong seed exchange networks were formed that facilitated linkages amongst various stakeholders in paddy seed conservation, cultivation, marketing, and consumption, primarily the farmers, marketing channels, agricultural officers, consumers, and other stakeholders. RSVs helped to build assets for food and nutrition security, improve resilience, and reduce climate and market-related shocks and vulnerabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.088 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSatoyama initiative thematic reviewSame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207