MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386604026 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.093

O.1.2-6 Music and Movement for Health: an arts-based Intervention to promote health and wellbeing of community dwelling older adults in Ireland

2023· article· en· W4386604026 on OpenAlexaff
Amanda M. Clifford, Orfhlaith NiBhriain, Steven Byrne, Pui Sze Cheung, Quinette Louw, Liam Glynn, Hilary Moss, Desmond O’Neill, Catherine Woods, Ali Sheikhi, Rosemary Joan Gowran, Catherine Maher, Brendan Kennelly, Jon Salsberg, Lehana Thabane

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceIntervention (counseling)Cluster randomised controlled trialMedicineRandomized controlled trialPopulationDanceGerontologyPhysical therapyPsychologyNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose The Music and Movement for Health study is a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial that aims to assess the feasibility of an innovative music and dance intervention that was developed to promote health and wellbeing of community dwelling older adults in Ireland. This study also aims to obtain preliminary data on the effect of the arts-based intervention on health and wellbeing in older adults. Methods One hundred community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older were recruited across seven clusters in the Mid-West region of Ireland. The seven clusters were randomly allocated to either the intervention group (n = 56, 4 clusters) or the control group (n = 44, 3 clusters). The intervention group participated in the Music and Movement for Health intervention which consisted of a 1.5-hour session and a 1-hour home-based programme weekly for 12-weeks. Music and Movement for Health is a complex intervention developed following the Medical Research Council Framework, co-designed with stakeholders using research evidence and theories to optimise engagement. Participants completed assessments at baseline and after 12 weeks and participated in focus group or interview after their participation. Results The targeted feasibility outcomes including the recruitment rates, the retention rates, attendance, and participation rates were achieved. Randomisation was completed according to the protocol and no safety issues were identified. The outcome measures used were acceptable and feasible for this population. The results on secondary outcomes and process evaluation of this trial are awaited. Conclusion This research strives to strengthen collaborative efforts to implement effective, sustainable and cost-effective programmes for older adults to support community connection, enhancing health and wellbeing, in turn reducing demands on the healthcare system. To our knowledge, Music and Movement for Health is the first evidence-based arts intervention that has incorporated music therapy with dance to improve health and wellbeing of community dwelling older adults. Feasibility results demonstrate that Music and Movement for Health is feasible, acceptable and safe for community dwelling older adults in the Mid-West region of Ireland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMusic Therapy and HealthFrench-language works237,207