A Systems Nephrology Approach to Diabetic Kidney Disease Research and Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and staging of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) via the serial assessment of routine laboratory indices lacks the granularity required to resolve the heterogeneous disease mechanisms driving progression in the individual patient. A systems nephrology approach may help resolve mechanisms underlying this clinically apparent heterogeneity, paving a way for targeted treatment of DKD. SUMMARY: Given the limited access to kidney tissue in routine clinical care of patients with DKD, data derived from renal tissue in preclinical model systems, including animal and in vitro models, can play a central role in the development of a targeted systems-based approach to DKD. Multi-centre prospective cohort studies, including the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) and the European Nephrectomy Biobank (ENBiBA) project, will improve access to human diabetic kidney tissue for research purposes. Integration of diverse data domains from such initiatives including clinical phenotypic data, renal and retinal imaging biomarkers, histopathological and ultrastructural data, and an array of molecular omics (transcriptomics, proteomics, etc.) alongside multi-dimensional data from preclinical modelling offers exciting opportunities to unravel individual-level mechanisms underlying progressive DKD. The application of machine and deep learning approaches may particularly enhance insights derived from imaging and histopathological/ultrastructural data domains. KEY MESSAGES: Integration of data from multiple model systems (in vitro, animal models, and patients) and from diverse domains (clinical phenotypic, imaging, histopathological/ultrastructural, and molecular omics) offers potential to create a precision medicine approach to DKD care wherein the right treatments are offered to the right patients at the right time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".