MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386630236 · doi:10.3390/e25091325

Design of Multi-User Noncoherent Massive SIMO Systems for Scalable URLLC

2023· article· en· W4386630236 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Dong, He Chen, Jian‐Kang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEntropy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops and optimizes a non-orthogonal and noncoherent multi-user massive single-input multiple-output (SIMO) framework, with the objective of enabling scalable ultra-reliable low-latency communications (sURLLC) in Beyond-5G (B5G)/6G wireless communication systems. In this framework, the huge diversity gain associated with the large-scale antenna array in the massive SIMO system is leveraged to ensure ultra-high reliability. To reduce the overhead and latency induced by the channel estimation process, we advocate for the noncoherent communication technique, which does not need the knowledge of instantaneous channel state information (CSI) but only relies on large-scale fading coefficients for message decoding. To boost the scalability of noncoherent massive SIMO systems, we enable the non-orthogonal channel access of multiple users by devising a new differential modulation scheme to ensure that each transmitted signal matrix can be uniquely determined in the noise-free case and be reliably estimated in noisy cases when the antenna array size is scaled up. The key idea is to make the transmitted signals from multiple geographically separated users be superimposed properly over the air, such that when the sum signal is correctly detected, the signal sent by each individual user can be uniquely determined. To further enhance the average error performance when the array antenna number is large, we propose a max-min Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence-based design by jointly optimizing the transmitted powers of all users and the sub-constellation assignments among them. The simulation results show that the proposed design significantly outperforms the existing max-min Euclidean distance-based counterpart in terms of error performance. Moreover, our proposed approach also has a better error performance compared to the conventional coherent zero-forcing (ZF) receiver with orthogonal channel training, particularly for cell-edge users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntropySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207