MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386634662 · doi:10.1109/tit.2023.3314048

Universal Graph Compression: Stochastic Block Models

2023· article· en· W4386634662 on OpenAlexafffund
Alankrita Bhatt, Ziao Wang, Chi Wang, Lele Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdjacency matrixLossless compressionComputer scienceCluster analysisAdjacency listData compressionAsymptotically optimal algorithmAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsGraphTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsCombinatoricsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the prevalent data science applications of processing large-scale graph data such as social networks and biological networks, this paper investigates lossless compression of data in the form of a labeled graph. Particularly, we consider a widely used random graph model, stochastic block model (SBM), which captures the clustering effects in social networks. An information-theoretic universal compression framework is applied, in which one aims to design a single compressor that achieves the asymptotically optimal compression rate, for every SBM distribution, without knowing the parameters of the SBM. Such a graph compressor is proposed in this paper, which universally achieves the optimal compression rate with polynomial time complexity for a wide class of SBMs. Existing universal compression techniques are developed mostly for stationary ergodic one-dimensional sequences. However, the adjacency matrix of SBM has complex two-dimensional correlations. The challenge is alleviated through a carefully designed transform that converts two-dimensional correlated data into almost i.i.d. submatrices. The sequence of submatrices is then compressed by a Krichevsky-Trofimov compressor, whose length analysis is generalized to identically distributed but arbitrarily correlated sequences. In four benchmark graph datasets, the compressed files from competing algorithms take 2.4 to 27 times the space needed by the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207