Underwater Sound Detection Thresholds (0.031-80 kHz) of Two California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus) and a Revised Generic Audiogram for the Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmasked behavioral audiograms of two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), an adult female (F01) and a subadult male (M02), were recorded using narrow-band frequency-modulated hearing test signals. Signals had a duration of 1 s and center frequencies ranging from 0.031 to 80 kHz. Hearing thresholds were measured by varying test signal amplitude according to the up-down staircase method. The resulting underwater audiograms (50% detection thresholds) of the two sea lions were similar and showed the typical mammalian U-shape. Maximum hearing sensitivity (58 and 57 dB re 1 mPa) occurred at 11.3 kHz for F01 and at 8 kHz for M02, respectively. The range of best hearing (defined as < 10 dB from the maximum sensitivity) was from 1 to 16 kHz (four octaves). The detection thresholds for hearing test signal frequencies 0.031, 0.040, and 0.050 kHz were lower than expected, possibly caused by a shift in perceptional modality from auditory to vibrotactile, or due to the difficulty in measuring accurate SPLs of such low frequencies in a pool. Measurements of particle motion deemed detection of these very low frequencies via the vibrissae unlikely. The present study extends the frequency range for which the hearing of California sea lions has been tested. Based on the two audiograms of the present study and audiograms reported by Reichmuth et al. (2013) and Cunningham & Reichmuth (2016), a revised generic audiogram for California sea lions is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".