SINKRONISASI KEARIFAN LOKAL TERHADAP PERNIKAHAN (Studi Kasus di Nagari Gunuang Rajo Kecamatan Batipuh)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the rules for having to confess Mamak for marriage by the people of Nagari Gunuang Rajo, Batipuh District for immigrants, the problem is the process of confessing Mamak for couples who are about to get married in Nagari Gunuang Rajo, Batipuh District, is stated in the data on the Nagari Adat Density Rule (KAN) Gunuang Rajo, CHAPTER IV article 3 of 2003 concerning the procedures for higgok mancakam tabang basitumpu or malakok ka Pangulu which reads: paying half gold for KAN administration, paying a quarter of gold for the graceful handed over to the pangalu present at the handover of both parties, paying a quarter of gold for the contents of jujuangan bundo kanduang, from this problem the question arises as to what extent the function of a marriage is for the Gunuang Rajo people, for couples who are about to get married cannot have a wedding in Nagari Gunuang Rajo if they have not confessed that they are Mamak. However, Islamic law does not regulate this. After the data was collected using research methods that were directly carried out in the field and analyzed inductively the results of the research resulted that according to Islamic law it is not an act that prevents people from getting married. However, the purpose of this rule is to regulate that the children of the mMamakwho are in Nagari Gunuang Rajo really understand the customary rules that lead to happiness in marriage so that the implementation of confessing mamak before marriage in Nagari Gunuang Rajo is reviewed by Islamic law, including the category of al- adha sahih or al-urf shahih.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".