MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386651916 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1348366/v1

Whole-Exome Sequencing Identified Mutational Profiles of Urothelial Carcinoma post Kidney Transplantation

2022· preprint· en· W4386651916 on OpenAlexaff
Lee‐Moay Lim, Wen‐Yu Chung, Daw‐Yang Hwang, Chih-Chuan Yu, Hung‐Lung Ke, Peir‐In Liang, Ting-Wei Lin, A‐Mei Huang, Hung‐Tien Kuo

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial HospitalUniversität zu KölnKaohsiung Medical University
KeywordsExome sequencingTransplantationKidney transplantationExomeBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGNAQGeneCancer researchBioinformaticsGeneticsMedicineMutationInternal medicineGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation is a lifesaving option of selected patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common de novo cancer after kidney transplantation in Taiwan. UC has the characteristics of high mutational burden and elevated degree of molecular heterogeneity compared with other solid tumors. However, there are limited research exploring the genomic alterations in UC after kidney transplantation. Methods: In this study, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) to compare the genetic alterations between UC developed after kidney transplantation (UCKT) and UC from hemodialysis patients (UCHD). After mapping and variant calling, a total of 18,733 and 11,093 mutations were identified from UCKT and UCHD patients, respectively. We first excluded known SNPs and then retained genes that were annotated in Cosmic, Intogen, and TCGA bladder databases for onco-driver genes. Seventeen UCKT unique genes with recurrent SNPs in more than two patients were subjected for further analysis. IPA pathway analysis was used to explore the interconnections among these genes. Results: 17 novel mutations of BTK, CARD11, ELL, FNBP1, GNAQ, HOXD13, IKZF1, MAX, MLLT10, NTRK3, PAX5, SEPTIN6, SEPTIN9, SH3GL1, SLC34A2, TAL1 , and TRAF7 were identified UCKT groups, and none of the genes had been reported in the genomes of patients with UC. Among the affected genes, GNAQ, IKZF1, and NTRK3 were potentially involved in the signaling network of UCKT. Conclusion : Our findings provide information for understanding the mutational landscape of UC developed after kidney transplantation, and a gene list that may be of great importance in related molecular mechanisms. Genetic analysis in malignancy after transplantation may help to identify high risk patients in post-transplant care and also illuminate a fundamental aspect of the molecular pathogenesis of post-transplantation UC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→