MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386702471 · doi:10.1134/s0081543823020098

Lie Algebras and Integrable Systems: Elastic Curves and Rolling Geodesics

2023· article· en· W4386702471 on OpenAlexaff
Velimir Jurdjevic

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsospectralGeodesicMathematicsIntegrable systemLie algebraPure mathematicsTangentLie groupAffine connectionQuadratic equationAffine transformationInvariant (physics)Lie conformal algebraAlgebra over a fieldLoop algebraMathematical analysisGeometryMathematical physicsCurrent algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper follows a long-standing fascination in the relevance of Lie algebras and Lie groups for problems of applied mathematics. It originates with the discovery that the mathematical formalism initiated by G. Kirchhoff to model the equilibrium configurations of an elastic rod can be extended to the isometry groups of certain Riemannian manifolds through control theoretic insights and the Maximum Principle, giving rise to a large class of Hamiltonian systems that link geometry with physics in novel ways. This paper focuses on the relations between the Kirchhoff-like affine–quadratic problem and the rolling geodesic problem associated with the rollings of homogeneous manifolds $$G/K$$ , equipped with a $$G$$ -invariant metric, on their tangent spaces. We will show that there is a remarkable connection between these two problems manifested through a common isospectral curve in the Lie algebra $$\mathfrak g$$ of $$G$$ . In the process we will reveal the significance of curvature for the theory of elastic curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Steklov Institute of MathematicsSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207