PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN TERHADAP PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DESA SEREANG KECAMATAN MARITENGNGAE KABUPATEN SIDENRENG RAPPANG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to: 1. find out the influence of leadership style on community participation in Sereang Village, Maritengngae District, Sidenreng Rappang Regency. 2. To find out the factors that influence the leadership style in Sereang Village, Maritengngae District, Sidenreng Rappang Regency. The population in this study is 779, with a sample of 78 people. The sampling technique used is random sampling or random sampling. Data collection techniques used 1. Observations 2. library studies 3. cetets (questionnaire). The collected data is then analyzed with the help of SPSS 16 for Windows applications. The results showed that 1. the influence of leadership style on community participation in Sereang Village Maritengngae District, Sidenreng Rappang District was in the unfavorable category with a percentage of 31.7%. 2. What factors influence the leadership style in Sereang Village, Maritengngae District, Sidenreng Rappang Regency are: Strength based on coercion (17.7%), Strength of appreciation (26%), Strength of expertise (19.5%), Official strength (11 , 9%), Strength of reference (14.4%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it