MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386737883 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00103

The past, present, and future of the brain imaging data structure (BIDS)

2024· review· en· W4386737883 on OpenAlexaff
Russell A. Poldrack, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Stefan Appelhoff, Yoni K. Ashar, Tibor Auer, Sylvain Baillet, Shashank Bansal, Leandro Beltrachini, Christian Bénar, Giacomo Bertazzoli, Suyash Bhogawar, Ross Blair, Marta Bortoletto, Mathieu Boudreau, Teon L Brooks, Vince D. Calhoun, Filippo Maria Castelli, Patricia Clement, Alexander L. Cohen, Julien Cohen‐Adad, Sasha D’Ambrosio, Gilles de Hollander, María de la Iglesia-Vayá, Alejandro de la Vega, Arnaud Delorme, Orrin Devinsky, Dejan Draschkow, Eugene Duff, Elizabeth DuPré, Eric Earl, Oscar Estéban, Franklin Feingold, Guillaume Flandin, Anthony Galassi, Giuseppe Gallitto, Melanie Ganz, Rémi Gau, James Gholam, Satrajit Ghosh, Alessio Giacomel, Ashley Gillman, Padraig Gleeson, Alexandre Gramfort, Samuel Guay, Giacomo Guidali, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Daniel A. Handwerker, Nell Hardcastle, Peer Herholz, Dora Hermes, Christopher J. Honey, Robert B. Innis, Horea-Ioan Ioanas, Andrew Jahn, Agâh Karakuzu, David B. Keator, Gregory Kiar, Bálint Kincses, Angela R. Laird, Jonathan C. Lau, Alberto Lazari, Jon Haitz Legarreta, Adam Li, Xiangrui Li, Bradley C. Love, Hanzhang Lu, Eleonora Marcantoni, Camille Maumet, Giacomo Mazzamuto, Steven L. Meisler, Mark E. Mikkelsen, Henk Mutsaerts, Thomas E. Nichols, Aki Nikolaidis, Gustav Nilsonne, Guiomar Niso, Martin Norgaard, Thomas W. Okell, Robert Oostenveld, Eduard Ort, Patrick J. Park, Mateusz Pawlik, Cyril Pernet, Franco Pestilli, Jan Petr, Christophe Phillips, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Luca Pollonini, Pradeep Reddy Raamana, Petra Ritter, Gaia Rizzo, Kay A. Robbins, Alexander P. Rockhill, Christine Rogers, Ariel Rokem, Chris Rorden, Alexandre Routier, Jose Manuel Saborit-Torres, Taylor Salo, Michael Schirner, Robert E. Smith, Tamás Spisák, Julia Sprenger, Nicole C. Swann, Martin Szinte, Sylvain Takerkart, Bertrand Thirion, Adam G. Thomas, Sajjad Torabian, Gaël Varoquaux, Bradley Voytek, Julius Welzel, Martin Wilson, Tal Yarkoni, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalWestern UniversityPolytechnique MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringBerlin Institute of HealthHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeNovo Nordisk FondenNational Institute of Mental HealthNovo NordiskDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Institutes of HealthHORIZON EUROPE European Innovation CouncilLaura and John Arnold FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaging NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207