The effect of customer relationship management (CRM) on business profitability in Jordanian logistics industries: The mediating role of customer satisfaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In today's competitive business environment, the implementation of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategies is essential for firms to succeed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between CRM, customer satisfaction, and business profitability in the Jordanian logistics industry. Specifically, the study examines how customer satisfaction mediates the effect of three key CRM on business profitability. To achieve this, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze data collected from 384 employees of logistics firms in Jordan. The results of the study suggest that CRM positively affects customer satisfaction, and that customer satisfaction has a significant mediating effect on the relationship between CRM and business profitability. The findings of this study have important implications for logistics firms seeking to improve their business profitability through the adoption of CRM. By focusing on the three key CRM (Customer Identification, Customer Acquisition, and Customer Analytics), firms can improve their customer satisfaction levels, which, in turn, can lead to improved business profitability. This study adds to the growing body of literature on CRM practices and their impact on business profitability, particularly in the context of the Jordanian logistics industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".