MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386758424 · doi:10.15294/inapes.v3i2.62185

Survey Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Oleh Guru PJOK Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kabupaten Bima

2022· article· en· W4386758424 on OpenAlexaff
Moh. Agus Irawan, Ranu Baskora Aji Putra

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Journal for Physical Education and Sport · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyPsychomotor learningPsychologyMathematics educationSample (material)Physical educationData collectionPedagogyCognitionMedical educationComputer scienceSociologyMedicineSocial scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education is the spearhead of the nation's progress learning physical education, sports and health, the balance of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor aspects must be considered, with the aim that learning is achieved optimally. The use of ICT-based learning media by junior high school physical education teachers which aims to assist the learning process and improve the quality of learning. This study aims to determine how much use of ICT-based learning media in Bima district area. Quantitative research methods using survey methods, and collects information or data using questionnaires and interviews. Research that takes a sample from a population and uses a questionnaire as the main data collection tool. The sample of this reasearch is physical education teachers at Junior High Schools in Bima Distric 27 teachers. The use of ICT-based learning media helps physical education teachers in the learning process, the average usage is 22.22% very good category, 37.04% good category, 33.33% poor category and 7.41% very poor category. In this study it can be concluded that the development of learning materials using ICT-based media by physical education teachers in junior high schools in Bima District are included in the good category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndonesian Journal for Physical Education and SportSame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207