Modifikasi Matras Lantai Dalam Pembelajaran Senam Lantai Materi Roll Depan Dan Roll Belakang Bagi Siswa Sma Negeri 3 Semarang Tahun 2022
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facts on the ground show that at SMA Negeri 3 Semarang, the learning activities of floor gymnastics for the front roll and back roll materials are not much in demand by students. The cause of the low interest of students is because they feel ashamed and afraid, think it is too difficult to do it, and cannot balance the body. It is dominated by female students and students who have fat bodies. From the facts in the field, the researchers created a tilted mattress tool to help students perform front roll and back roll motion skills. This research is a development research, which uses the Research and Development method. The product development procedures are: (1) information gathering, (2) initial planning, (3) developing the initial product, (4) expert validation, (5) initial revision, (6) small-scale test (50 students), (7 ) product revision, (8) large scale test (80 students), (9) final product revision, (10) final results. This research produces a product, namely a tilting mattress tool. Data was collected using questionnaires obtained from expert evaluations and student questionnaires. Based on the results of the development, small-scale trials obtained a percentage of 79.34% (Good), the results of large-scale trials were 78.22% (Good), and for expert validation tests obtained a percentage of 86.66% (Good). The conclusion of this study is based on the assessment criteria that have been determined, the product of this tilting mattress aid is included in the good criteria for use. Suggestions for schools, teachers, and students can participate and contribute in the use of modified floor mats in learning floor exercise with front roll and back roll materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".