Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle A lbert Schweitzer began his 1930 study of the Apostle Paul with the following definition of mysticism: "We are always in the presence of mysticism when we find a human being looking upon the division between earthly and super earthly, temporal and eternal, as transcended, and feeling himself, while still externally amid the earthly and temporal, to belong to the super-earthly and eternal."1Schweitzer went on to differentiate between "primitive" mysticism, akin to magic in its naive faith in the efficacy of ceremony and ritual, and "developed" mysticism, wherein "the conception of the universal is reached" and "entrance into the super-earthly and eternal then takes place through an act of thinking."2The mysticism of the Apostle Paul, he argued, stood somewhere between these two conceptions, combining the Apostle's singular intellection that unity with God is mediated through Christ with his simple faith that "being-in-Christ" is effected by dying and rising with Christ in baptism.Despite substantive criticism of his insistence on the realized eschatological effect of baptism3 and, ironically, his over-emphasis on the intellectual character of Paul's mysticism,4 Schweitzer's definition remains in some ways a fitting description of his subject.Paul himself professed to contemplate not things that are seen but things that are unseen and eternal, while yet remaining in his "earthly tabernacle":1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.212 | 0.087 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".