Bibliographic record
Abstract
ender studies as an area of research demonstrates the influence and reach of gender within the human experience.History, politics and religion have all come to bare the facelift that the unearthing of gender reveals.Traditionally human biology intimately connects the body with gender identity.In the frame of post-structuralism, however, the body has been identified as the place where gender plays out, not its determining factor.Despite biological traditionalism, male and female bodies are constructed bodies, bodies that emerge as homosexual or heterosexual, as men and women through "the reiterations of certain discursive practices."1The body then becomes a text to be read and these discursive practices are places of gender construction.Bodies in history, politics and religion embody subjectivity through the roles they perform and in turn, read like a library of asserted ideas.The Christian Middle Ages presents a plethora of bodily devotion.With the birth of the stigmata in Francis of Assisi, the anchoritic visions of Julian of Norwich and the divine marriage of Bernard of Clairvaux in his treatise On the Song of Songs, the body emerged as the choice vehicle for divine communication.As such, the body was the medium for spiritual messages.A person's religious life played out on their body and in turn, medieval spiritual devotions created and maintained the Christian bodies that housed them.The medieval turn toward the body provided multiple social and intellectual resources to deal with the confines of human flesh, such as life, birth and death.2This paper looks to use the body as a platform 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".