MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386766047 · doi:10.26443/arc.v28i.905

Measure of Justice

2000· article· en· W4386766047 on OpenAlexaffabout
Scott McLoughlin Marratto, Lawrence E. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueArc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Economic JusticeMathematicsSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For evil belongs to the class of the unlimited, as the Pythagoreans conjectured, and good to that of the limited. -Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics[F]or man, in so far as he is a natural being, keeping within limits is justice.-Simone Weil, "The Pythagorean Doctrine" ne of the pillars of modem liberalism is its assertion of the radi-V^/ cal autonomy of the human subject.Within modernity, all of nature, both human and non-human, comes to be understood in rela tion to that essential freedom and it follows, then, that any limits to the exercise of freedom must, themselves, be freely postulated by an autonomous will.Such limits are, in the final analysis, seldom more than a matter of convenience or the terms of a contract between competing interests.Because freedom is seen as an absolute and selfevident good it becomes increasingly impossible to speak publicly of goods which may transcend, or circumscribe or limit that freedom.Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor writes: "The notion of selfdetermining freedom, pushed to its limit, doesn't recognize any boundaries, anything given that I have to respect in my exercise of self-determining choice" (1991, 68).Freedom as the essence of being can be seen as the dominant idea in modern Western thought.It finds perhaps its fullest expression in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArc The Journal of the School of Religious StudiesSame topicPolitical Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207