MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386766248 · doi:10.26443/arc.v43i.375

From Ghost to Goddess

2015· article· en· W4386766248 on OpenAlexaff
Darry Dinnell

Bibliographic record

VenueArc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyArtArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cuḍel Mā is herself no stranger to pop culture media.At least t o feature-length Gujarati-language films have been released ith the u e as the central theme.. -108 v Darry Dinnell been depicted in the village setting with minimal or aniconic representations such as r s (tridents) and stones smeared with red lead, they now have taken on distinctive iconographies patterned after lithographs of Sanskritic goddesses li e La mi or Sarasvat -agreeable-looking young women with easily identifiable animal vehicles (or v hanas).o Melaḍ rides the goat, Bahucarā the rooster, and Khoḍ yār the crocodile. 2 In terms of iconography, Cuḍel Mā contrasts ith other Gujarati goddesses, for her main icon at the igh Court of Kungher is simply a ame in an oil lamp.The ame is ubi uitous at Gujarati goddess temples, but for Cuḍel Mā and her devotees, this minimalistic symbol ta es on maximal theological e ect.Indeed, at Kungher, Cuḍel is figured as neither a ghost nor a itch but instead as the supreme goddess, the ame embodying the totality of akti.Drawing on colonial-era writings and ethnographic data from both physical and virtual sites, this paper will attempt to trace Cuḍel Mā s movement beyond her familiar haunts to become a singular, universalized mother goddess amenable to upwardly mobile, middle-class sensibilities of Gujarati devotees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArc The Journal of the School of Religious StudiesSame topicReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesFrench-language works237,207