The Salvation of the Flesh in Tertullian of Carthage: Dressing for the Resurrection, by Carly Daniel-Hughes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
only a preliminary study, but it does bring attention to the tendency in scholarship to treat such texts as solely written material.If Thunder was performed, it is fascinating to think what kind of reaction it may have wished to incite in its audience.The final chapter concludes some of the discussions of the previous chapters and reflects on the role of Thunder in today's society.The text's challenge and critique of gender and other social categories can also be applied to modern issues regarding identity.Lastly, there is the Coptic edition of Thunder and the editors' own English translation.These are accompanied by extensive annotations that justify some of the editors' unconventional translation decisions and demonstrate knowledge of other existing translations.This volume represents the first book-length treatment in English of Thunder.In summary, it applies various methodologies to the text and approaches it by looking at different issues that affect the ancient meanings of Thunder and the potential interpretations for today's world.At times the chapters can be repetitive, where the editors discuss issues that were dealt with in previous chapters, with the insights worded only slightly different.Overall though, this volume brings attention to some issues that have not been dealt with adequately in the scholarship on Thunder.This volume is commendable for not simply treating Thunder as a "Gnostic" text, as is often the tendency in scholarship.The editors have done great work in opening the door for the scholarship on the performance of Thunder, where much potential lies.The editors make some fascinating observations regarding gender blurring and destabilization due to the presence of both masculine and feminine copulas in the Coptic text, but some of the arguments begin to fall apart when one considers that Thunder is likely a Greek to Coptic translation.These observations may not hold up as well with the non-gendered ἐγώ εἰμι of Greek.The editors have chosen to highlight the gender nuances found in the Coptic that are difficult to translate in English, a decision which may be controversial to other scholars of the field, but it offers a fresh perspective on Thunder that paves new possibilities in understanding the intent of such a bizarre, yet fascinating, ancient text. e Salvation of the Flesh in Tertullian of Carthage: Dressing for the Resurrection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".