MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386768162 · doi:10.1007/s11307-023-01849-y

Use of Magnetotactic Bacteria as an MRI Contrast Agent for In Vivo Tracking of Adoptively Transferred Immune Cells

2023· article· en· W4386768162 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrea Nuschke, Caitrin Sobey-Skelton, Bassel Dawod, Brianna Kelly, Marie‐Laurence Tremblay, Christa Davis, James Rioux, Kimberly Brewer

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Imaging and Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIWK Health Centre
KeywordsIn vivoImmune systemCellCancer researchCytotoxic T cellCTL*Magnetotactic bacteriaCell therapyPreclinical imagingChemistryBiologyIn vitroImmunologyBiochemistryBacteriaCD8

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose In vivo immune cell tracking using MRI is a valuable tool for studying the mechanisms underlying successful cancer therapies. Current cell labeling methods using superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) lack the specificity and persistence needed to track the fate and location of transplanted cells long-term. Magnetospirillium magneticum is a commercially available, iron-producing bacterium that can be taken up by, and live harmoniously within, mammalian cells as magneto-endosymbionts (MEs). MEs have shown promise as labeling agents for in vivo stem and cancer cell tracking but have yet to be evaluated in immune cells. This pilot study examined ME labeling in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and dendritic cells (DCs) and its effects on cell purity, function and MRI contrast. Procedures: MDSCs, CTLs and DCs were incubated with MEs at various ME labelling ratios (MLR) and various biological metrics and iron uptake were assessed. For in vivo imaging, MDSCs were labeled overnight with either MEs or SPIO (Molday ION Rhodamine B) and injected into C3 tumor-bearing mice via tail vein injection 24 days post-implant and scanned daily with MRI for one week to assess cellular quantification. Results Following incubations MDSCs contained 0.62 and 2.22 pg Fe/ cell. CTLs achieved Fe loading of < 0.5 pg/ cell and DCs achieved Fe loading of ~ 1.4pg/cell. The suppressive functionality of MDSCs at 1000MLR was not affected by ME labeling but was affected at 2000MLR. Markers of CTL dysfunction were not markedly affected by ME labeling, nor were DC markers. In vivo data demonstrated that the MDSCs labeled with MEs generated sufficient contrast to be detectable using TurboSPI, similar to SPIO-labeled cells. Conclusions Cells can be labeled with pre-clinically relevant amounts of MEs without compromising cell viability. Care must be taken at higher concentrations of MEs, which may affect the functional activity and/or morphology of some cell types. Immune cells with minimal phagocytic behaviour have much lower iron content per cells after incubation with MEs vs SPIO; however, MEs can successfully be used as a contrast agent for phagocytic immune cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Imaging and Biology→Same topicCancer Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→