MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy calibration of germanium detectors for the Majorana Demonstrator

2023· article· en· W4386769850 on OpenAlexafffund
I.J. Arnquist, F.T. Avignone, A.S. Barabash, C.J. Barton, K.H. Bhimani, E. Blalock, B. Bos, M. Busch, M. Buuck, T.S. Caldwell, Y.-D. Chan, C.D. Christofferson, P.-H. Chu, Michael Clark, C. Cuesta, J.A. Detwiler, Yu. Efremenko, H. Ejiri, S.R. Elliott, G.K. Giovanetti, M. P. Green, J. Gruszko, I. S. Guinn, V.E. Guiseppe, C. R. Haufe, R. Henning, D. Hervas Aguilar, E. W. Hoppe, A. Hostiuc, M. F. Kidd, I. Kim, R. T. Kouzes, T.E. Lannen, A. Li, J. M. López-Castaño, E. L. Martín, R.D. Martin, R. Massarczyk, S.J. Meijer, T. K. Oli, L.S. Paudel, W. Pettus, A.W.P. Poon, D.C. Radford, A. L. Reine, K. Rielage, N. W. Ruof, Danielle Schaper, D. Tedeschi, R.L. Varner, S. Vasilyev, J.F. Wilkerson, C. Wiseman, W. Xu, C.-H. Yu, B. X. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Instrumentation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersPacific Northwest National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNuclear PhysicsLos Alamos National LaboratoryL'Oreal USAOak Ridge National LaboratorySouth Dakota Board of RegentsLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMAJORANACalibrationGermaniumDetectorSemiconductor detectorDouble beta decayPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)Nuclear physicsRemote sensingInstrumentation (computer programming)OpticsComputer scienceGeologyOptoelectronicsNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Majorana Demonstrator was a search for neutrinoless double-beta decay (0 νββ ) in the 76 Ge isotope. It was staged at the 4850-foot level of the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF) in Lead, SD. The experiment consisted of 58 germanium detectors housed in a low background shield and was calibrated once per week by deploying a 228 Th line source for 1 to 2 hours. The energy scale calibration determination for the detector array was automated using custom analysis tools. We describe the offline procedure for calibration of the Demonstrator germanium detectors, including the simultaneous fitting of multiple spectral peaks, estimation of energy scale uncertainties, and the automation of the calibration procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of InstrumentationSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207