MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PO-057: Systemic delivery of miR-27a* using ultrasound-targeted microbubble cavitation causes tumor regression

2023· article· en· W4386784280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikhil Chari, Cheng Chen, Thiruganesh Ramasamy, Xucai Chen, Wei Lü, Khaja Khan, Lorena I. Gomez, Luisa M. Solis, Flordeliza S. Villanueva, Stephen Y. Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchMicrobubblesIn vivoPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaymicroRNAHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaMedicineEpidermal growth factor receptorSmall interfering RNAAKT1BiologyRNAPathologyRadiation therapyCancerUltrasoundSignal transductionGeneHead and neck cancerInternal medicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Benefits from treatment with antibodies targeting the overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are observed primarily in combination with radiation therapy; anti-EGFR monotherapy results in less than 10% disease response. Despite extensive biological justification for EGFR inhibitors, marginal clinical benefit has been observed in broad populations. MicroRNAs (miRs) are short, endogenous, noncoding RNA molecules (19-22 nucleotides) that bind to target mRNAs, causing post-transcriptional RNA interference. Unlike siRNAs, which target a single gene, miRs have evolved to simultaneously target multiple proteins, making them attractive therapeutic candidates. Our previous studies showed that miR-27a* is repressed in HNSCC, and miR-27a* levels correlate with survival. We identified multiple miR-27a* targets in the PI3K-AKT1-mTOR pathway, the most commonly overexpressed mitogenic pathway in HNSCC, including EGFR, AKT1, and mTOR. Ectopic expression of miR-27a* inhibits tumor growth in both in vitro and in vivo HNSCC models, suggesting miR-27a* as a potential therapeutic intervention. However, substantial challenges exist in delivery of miRs to tumors. In the current study, we used an image-guided theranostic platform to systemically deliver miR-27a* to tumors. SCCVII-derived xenografts in immunocompetent C3H/HeJ mice were treated with miR-27a* or control miR mimics (miR-C). Therapeutic ultrasound was delivered using a single-element immersion transducer oriented directly over the tumor site, following continuous infusion of microbubbles loaded with 10 µg miR-27a* or miR-C into the jugular vein. Successful destruction and replenishment of microbubbles in the tumor area was confirmed by simultaneous contrast-specific ultrasound perfusion imaging with a clinical ultrasound imaging system. Using miRNAScope, an in situ hybridization-based method, we were able to visualize ultrasound-targeted microbubble cavitation (UTMC)-mediated delivery and spatial distribution of miR-27a* to the tumor cells. We found that UTMC delivery of miR-27a* lowered protein expression of miR-27a* targets (EGFR, AKT1, mTOR, NUP62, and ΔNP63α) compared with UTMC-delivered miR-C or intravenous miR-27a* treated mice at 48 hours after treatment. We also found that UTMC delivery of miR-27a* resulted in a significant reduction in tumor volume compared with both UTMC-delivered miR-C and intravenously delivered miR-27a* after 2 weeks (n=6 all groups). The potential therapeutic effects of miR-27a* were confirmed by its observed effect in lowering miR-27a* target levels and a significant inhibition of tumor growth. In conclusion, these observations clearly show that i) UTMC is an effective systemic miR delivery platform with the ability to concentrate miR delivery to the tumor site, and ii) miR-27a* is a potentially effective treatment for HNSCC. Citation Format: Nikhil S. Chari, Cheng Chen, Thiruganesh Ramasamy, Xucai Chen, Wei Lu, Khaja B. Khan, Lorena I. Gomez, Luisa M. Solis, Flordeliza S. Villanueva, Stephen Y. Lai. Systemic delivery of miR-27a* using ultrasound-targeted microbubble cavitation causes tumor regression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-057.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→