MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PO-047: A novel saliva miRNA panel of promising diagnostic biomarkers for oral cancer: The association of miR-21 with smoking history

2023· article· en· W4386784760 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitra P. Vageli, Panagiotis G. Doukas, Benjamin L. Judson

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalivaReceiver operating characteristicMedicineInternal medicineCancermicroRNAArea under the curveConfidence intervalOncologyBasal cellHead and neck cancerCarcinogenesisGastroenterologyBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Tobacco use is implicated in the carcinogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which is associated with poor survival if not diagnosed early. It is urgent to develop a novel non-invasive and highly sensitive risk assessment and diagnostic method to screen OSCC. Here, we explored salivary miRNAs as a screening method for OSCC in a high-risk group of patients, such as smokers. Materials and methods: Saliva was collected from 44 individuals (23 HPV-negative OSCC; 21 controls; an equal number of smokers and non-smokers). Twenty head and neck cancer-related miRNA markers were analyzed by qPCR, using dual-labeled probes (miR-20A, miR-21, miR-27B, miR-29A, miR-29B, miR-29C, miR-31, miR-34a, miR-99a, miR-125a, miR-136, miR-139, miR-155, miR-192, miR-200A, miR-375, miR-425A, miR-451a, miR-504, miR-3928; RNU6 control), and by Welch’s t-test and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve; GraphPad Prism 7.0. Results: A panel of 4 miRNA markers (miR-21, miR-136, miR-3928, miR-29B) was found to be significantly overexpressed in the saliva of OSCC versus healthy controls with a diagnostic ability (p<0.05 by Welch’s t-test; AUC (area under the ROC curve): 64-85%, sensitivity: 50-67%, specificity: 32-38%; 95% confidence interval; by ROC curve analysis). “Oncomir” miR-21 levels (miR-21/RNU6) were found to be significantly higher in the saliva of OSCC patients with a smoking history (mean ± SD: 0.17 ± 0.19) versus never-smokers (mean ± SD: 0.0056 ± 0.0075) (p<0.05; by t-test) with a diagnostic ability (AUC: 90%, sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 30%; 95% confidence interval). Conclusions: We provide a novel panel of non-invasive, easy-to-apply, and sensitive biomarkers, for the diagnosis of oral cancer, including miR-21 in individuals with a smoking history, encouraging their validation in a large group of head and neck cancer patients. Citation Format: Dimitra Vageli, Panagiotis G. Doukas, Benjamin L. Judson. A novel saliva miRNA panel of promising diagnostic biomarkers for oral cancer: The association of miR-21 with smoking history [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-047.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→