MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386789308 · doi:10.33137/utjph.v4i1.40526

Test, Link, Call Project: Prescribing Phones to People Who Experience Criminalization to Improve Access to Hepatitis C Care

2023· article· en· W4386789308 on OpenAlex
Amrit Tiwana, Julia Santana Parrilla, Pam Young, Mo Korchinski, Daryl Luster, Deb Schmitz, Sofia Bartlett

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsVancouver Native Health SocietyUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminalizationHealth carePopulationMedicinePhoneNursingPsychologyInternet privacyPolitical scienceEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: People who experience criminalization, including people who use drugs and people who experience homelessness, have higher rates of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and lower rates of HCV treatment uptake compared to the general Canadian population. A key reason reported for this is many do not have a cell phone, so are unable to contact healthcare providers. Methods: We launched a Quality Improvement project called ‘Test Link Call’ (TLC) in October 2021 in British Columbia, Canada. We used Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test whether a free cell phone with a 6-month plan and connection to a Peer Health Mentor (PHM) would improve access to care among people who experience criminalization diagnosed with HCV. Participants were referred from prisons, drug treatment programs, homeless shelters, and hospitals. To evaluate the impact of TLC, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders, which were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Results: Over 12 months, 141 participants received a cell phone and connection to a PHM. Interviews were conducted with 10 participants, 3 PHMs, and 5 healthcare providers. All stakeholders interviewed described TLC as effective at engaging people who experience criminalization and who are affected by HCV, and beneficial for supporting them to access treatment. Stakeholders described several benefits of TLC for participants, including elevated sense of personal value, improved convenience in accessing HCV care and other services, and increased social connection. Disadvantages reported were vulnerability of phones to theft, and technological illiteracy reducing device usability. Healthcare providers and PHMs described improved communication and trust with TLC participants due to them easily being contactable. Implications/Conclusion of Research: TLC demonstrates that providing cell phones plus connection to a PHM to people who experience criminalization with HCV infection is an effective strategy to enhance connection to HCV care, and provide added benefits to individuals including increased sense of personal value and connection to family and friends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it