Canadian Blood Services traceback investigation of a suspected case of transfusion‐transmitted malaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A 4-month-old infant hospitalized since birth received multiple blood transfusions. In March 2022, Plasmodium falciparum was confirmed with nucleic acid testing. As the mother was assessed as unlikely to be the source of infection, the blood operator initiated a traceback investigation for a potential blood donor source. The patient had received 13 red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (aliquoted from 11 donors), 4 apheresis platelet (PLT) transfusions and 16 buffy coat pooled PLT transfusions. The blood operator medical team developed a supplementary malaria infection risk questionnaire to identify donors at highest risk of life-time malaria infection, based on birthplace, residence, or travel in malaria-endemic regions. RESULTS: With 79 donors initially implicated, initial focus was on donors of RBC components. The 11 RBC donors were contacted and assessed using the supplementary questionnaire. Three donors, all of whom met current malaria-related donor eligibility criteria, were deemed high risk of prior malaria infection. These donors consented to P. falciparum serology and nucleic acid testing (NAT). One donor who was born and had resided in an endemic West African country for 14 years, was positive for P. falciparum by serology (indirect fluorescent antibody test) and NAT-(Ct ≥32). Lookback of this donor's transfused fresh co-components and prior donation identified no other malaria cases. CONCLUSION: This was a probable transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) case from an eligible donor who in retrospect was found to have unrecognized, asymptomatic, semi-immune malaria infection, and who was potentially infectious. Blood donor lack of recall of prior malaria infection does not negate the risk of TTM from those who have lived in malaria-endemic countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".