Effect of Faradarmani Consciousness Field on the Mice 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of complementary and alternative medicine along with conventional methods of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, with the aim of cancer prevention and treatment, has been investigated and validated in various preclinical and clinical studies. Meanwhile, in contrast to the widespread use of medicinal plants and other complementary and alternative medicine methods in the preclinical trials with animal models of cancer, as an important step confirming the safe and effective use in humans, similar studies in the field of mind-body modalities are rarely examined. A new treatment method founded and introduced by Mohammad Ali Taheri provides a different type of consciousness (Taheri Consciousness Fields) that is neither matter nor energy. The effectiveness and capability of this new complementary and alternative medicine were examined in this study, and the effectiveness of one of Taheri Consciousness Fields (TCFs) named Faradarmani, was investigated in the 4T1 orthotopic breast cancer spontaneous metastasis Balb/c mouse model. According to the results, the Faradarmani CF treatment, during tumor progression, had a significant effect on inhibiting the growth of cancerous masses and preventing metastasis in the mice animal model under the study. Moreover, this treatment had a reproducible and significant positive effect on survival behavior and natural vital functions of the treated mice in comparison with the untreated control group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it