Transcriptomic signatures of Aβ- and tau-induced neuronal dysfunction reveal inflammatory processes at the core of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Molecular mechanisms enabling pathology-induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remain elusive. Here, we use mechanistic computational models to infer the combined influence of PET-measured Aβ and tau burdens on fMRI-derived neuronal activity and to subsequently identify the transcriptomic spatial correlates of AD pathophysiology. Our results reveal overrepresented genes and biological processes that participate in synaptic degeneration and interact with Aβ and tau deposits. Furthermore, we confirmed the central role of the immune system and neuroinflammatory pathways within AD pathogenesis; microglia were significantly enriched in the gene set associated with Aβ and tau synergistic influences on neuronal activity. Lastly, our computational approach unveiled drug candidates with the potential to halt or reduce the observed pathological effects on neuronal activity, including existing medication for cancer, immune disorders, and cardiovascular diseases, many currently under clinical evaluation in AD. Overall, these findings support the notion that the AD brain experiences functional changes intricately associated with a diverse spectrum of molecular processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".