MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386817435 · doi:10.1002/ajh.27098

Bone marrow fibrosis is associated with non‐response to <scp>CD19 CAR T</scp>‐cell therapy in <scp>B</scp>‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2023· article· en· W4386817435 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Anil, Ahab Alnemri, Andrew Lytle, Brian Lockhart, Ashley Anil, Michael Baumgartner, Kirubel Gebre, Jared McFerran, Stephan A. Grupp, Susan R. Rheingold, Vinodh Pillai

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hematology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCBC Cancer Agency
FundersCURE Childhood Cancer Association
KeywordsStromal cellBone marrowMedicineCD19FibrosisT cellCancer researchB cellMyelofibrosisCell therapyImmunologyPathologyCellFlow cytometryBiologyImmune systemAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy is used to treat relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The role of the pre-CAR bone marrow (BM) stromal microenvironment in determining response to CAR T-cell therapy has been understudied. We performed whole transcriptome analysis, reticulin fibrosis assessment and CD3 T-cell infiltration on BM core biopsies from pre- and post-CAR timepoints for 61 patients, as well as on a cohort of 54 primary B-ALL samples. Pathways of fibrosis, extracellular matrix development, and associated transcription factors AP1 and TGF-β3, were enriched and upregulated in nonresponders (NR) even prior to CAR T cell therapy. NR showed significantly higher levels of BM fibrosis compared to complete responders by both clinical reticulin assessment and AI-assisted digital image scoring. CD3+ T cells showed a trend toward lower infiltration in NR. NR had significantly higher levels of pre-CAR fibrosis compared to primary B-ALL. High levels of fibrosis were associated with lower overall survival after CAR T-cell therapy. In conclusion, BM fibrosis is a novel mechanism mediating nonresponse to CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in B-ALL. A widely used clinically assay for quantitating myelofibrosis can be repurposed to determine patients at high risk of non-response. Genes and pathways associated with BM fibrosis are a potential target to improve response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HematologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207