Penyesuaian Dalam Kalangan Siswa Guru Orang Kurang Upaya Penglihatan di Sebuah Institut Pendidikan Guru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore adjustments made and the strategies of adjustments visually impaired trainee teachers take at a Teacher Education Institute.This study uses a case study design.Purposive sampling was used to engage four visually impaired respondents who are trainee teachers at one of the institutes of teacher education in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur.The research tools used are semistructured interviews and document analysis.This study used qualitative methods to ensure respondents had the opportunity to share their experiences and opinions.Data was analysed using qulitative methods.The findings of the study reveal that provincial adaptations such as academic and social aspects or the main demographic aspects were made.The family factors and environmental adjustments and adjustements to amenities were other factors of adaptation that were made.Strategies such as obtaining parental views and social support from a former teacher were some strategies employed.Some areas that need to be taken into consideration especially are the role of IPGM, the provision of facilities and the implementation of appropriate learning methods for these visually impaired trainee teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".