MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386836929 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1260627

Monoclonal antibodies neutralizing alpha-hemolysin, bicomponent leukocidins, and clumping factor A protected against Staphylococcus aureus-induced acute circulatory failure in a mechanically ventilated rabbit model of hyperdynamic septic shock

2023· article· en· W4386836929 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nhu T. Q. Nguyen, Thien N. M. Doan, Kei Sato, Christine Tkaczyk, Bret R. Sellman, Binh An Diep

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHamilton Health Sciences FoundationAstraZeneca
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusHemolysinMicrobiologyShock (circulatory)Septic shockMedicineAlpha (finance)Monoclonal antibodyCirculatory systemHyperdynamic circulationAntibodyImmunologyBiologySepsisBacteriaVascular resistanceHemodynamicsVirulenceAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Patients with septic shock caused by Staphylococcus aureus have mortality rates exceeding 50%, despite appropriate antibiotic therapy. Our objectives were to establish a rabbit model of S. aureus septic shock and to determine whether a novel immunotherapy can prevent or halt its natural disease progression. Methods Anesthetized rabbits were ventilated with lung-protective low-tidal volume, instrumented for advanced hemodynamic monitoring, and characterized for longitudinal changes in acute myocardial dysfunction by echocardiography and sepsis-associated biomarkers after S. aureus intravenous challenge. To demonstrate the potential utility of this hyperdynamic septic shock model for preclinical drug development, rabbits were randomized for prophylaxis with anti-Hla/Luk/ClfA monoclonal antibody combination that neutralizes alpha-hemolysin (Hla), the bicomponent pore-forming leukocidins (Luk) including Panton-Valentine leukocidin, leukocidin ED, and gamma-hemolysin, and clumping factor A (ClfA), or an irrelevant isotype-matched control IgG (c-IgG), and then challenged with S. aureus. Results Rabbits challenged with S. aureus, but not those with saline, developed a hyperdynamic state of septic shock characterized by elevated cardiac output (CO), increased stroke volume (SV) and reduced systemic vascular resistance (SVR), which was followed by a lethal hypodynamic state characterized by rapid decline in mean arterial pressure (MAP), increased central venous pressure, reduced CO, reduced SV, elevated SVR, and reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction, thereby reproducing the hallmark clinical features of human staphylococcal septic shock. In this model, rabbits pretreated with anti-Hla/Luk/ClfA mAb combination had 69% reduction in mortality when compared to those pretreated with c-IgG (P<0.001). USA300-induced acute circulatory failure—defined as >70% decreased in MAP from pre-infection baseline—occurred in only 20% (2/10) of rabbits pretreated with anti-Hla/Luk/ClfA mAb combination compared to 100% (9/9) of those pretreated with c-IgG. Prophylaxis with anti-Hla/Luk/ClfA mAb combination halted progression to lethal hypodynamic shock, as evidenced by significant protection against the development of hyperlactatemia, hypocapnia, hyperkalemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, monocytopenia, lymphopenia, as well as biomarkers associated with acute myocardial injury. Conclusion These results demonstrate the potential utility of a mechanically ventilated rabbit model that reproduced hallmark clinical features of hyperdynamic septic shock and the translational potential of immunotherapy targeting S. aureus virulence factors for the prevention of staphylococcal septic shock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207