MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Re-examination of the Aïn Allegua-Aguiba celestite-Pb-Zn salt diapir-related Mississippi Valley-type deposits (Nappes zone, Northwestern Tunisia): New conceptual model

2023· article· en· W4386840395 on OpenAlexaff
Aroua Mzoughi, Hechmi Garnit, Salah Bouhlel, Georges Beaudoin, Driss Khlifa, Anis Barkouti, Zied Tebaibi

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySphaleriteGalenaGeochemistryAnhydriteDolostoneDiapirBrecciaAluniteMineralogyCalciteFluid inclusionsPyriteDolomiteCarbonate rockGypsumHydrothermal circulationSedimentary rockGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The celestite-rich and Pb-Zn-poor Aïn Allegua deposits are located at the northeastern extremity of the Dougas diapir in the Nappes zone of northern Tunisia. The Sr-Ba-Zn-Pb mineral system studied in this paper is enclosed in a Triassic breccia, labeled cap rock, located between the Triassic diapir and the surrounding Cretaceous to Lutetian marine sediments. It consists of evaporite dissolution float breccia where Triassic dolostone clasts are floating in a Triassic matrix of anhydrite and argillites. Five mineralizing stages are recognized, which are from early to late: celestite (stage 1); hydrothermal dolomite (stage 2); crosscutting galena-barite or sphalerite-galena-barite-calcite (stage 3); (4) fracture and karst filled by barite, celestite, and galena (stage 4); and late supergene mineralization (strontianite, smithsonite, and cerussite) (stage 5). The present study shows that the celestite and Pb-Zn mineralization formed from the circulation in the cap rock of at least three fluids : (1) fluid A (100-150°C; 10 to 25 wt.% NaCl eq.) deposited the celestite ; (2) fluid B (125 to 185°C; 29 to 34 wt.% NaCl eq.) deposited the hydrothermal dolomite, and (3) fluid C (temperatures around 90°C; 14 to 22 wt.% NaCl eq.) deposited the calcite that accompanied sphalerite and galena precipitation. The δ34S values for sphalerite and galena fall within a narrow range from +10.4‰ to +18.9‰ (avr. 13‰) indicating a homogeneous source of sulfur. The δ34S values of celestite and barite are also relatively homogeneous from +14.7 to +23‰ (ave. +16.5‰) and match those of Tunisian Triassic gypsum and Triassic marine sulfates (δ34S = +15‰). The temperature of deposition together with sulfur isotope data indicate that the reduced sulfur in sulfides was derived through thermochemical sulfate reduction of Triassic sulfate. The lead isotopes in galena show that Pb, and probably Zn and Ba were extracted from the upper crustal rocks. Part of the strontium is derived from the Triassic anhydrite and the other part is probably transported to the cap rock in formation waters. The tectonic setting, the carbonated nature of the host rocks, the epigenetic style of the mineralization, and the mineral associations, together with fluid inclusions data and sulfur and lead isotopes show that the Aïn Allegua deposit belongs to the diapir-related Mississippi Valley-type (MVT) deposits of the Eastern Maghreb salt diapirs province, that formed, as the most of the MVT deposits and districts in the world, from basinal brines with no mixing with metamorphic and/or magmatic fluid or involvement of a heat source from a concealed sill or magmatic intrusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207