MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386840847 · doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00713

Spatial prediction and uncertainty estimation of crucial GlobalSoilMap properties - A contextual study in the semi-arid area of western Iran

2023· article· en· W4386840847 on OpenAlex
Leila Lotfollahi, Mohammad Amir Delavar, Asim Biswas, Mohammad Jamshidi, Shahrokh Fatehi, Ruhollah Taghizadeh‐Mehrjardi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma Regional · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariateSoil carbonEnvironmental scienceAridRandom forestLinear regressionSoil scienceVegetation (pathology)StatisticsSpatial distributionSoil testRegression analysisRegressionSoil waterSpatial variabilityMathematicsHydrology (agriculture)EcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information on the spatial distribution of organic carbon (OC), salinity (EC), and soil pH in the semi-arid region of the Chahardowli Plain in western Iran is limited. Though soil carbon is the most common property mapped in GlobalSoilMap, EC, and pH affect OC content and other soil properties and functions. To study variations in these properties and map their distribution, soil samples were collected at depths of 0–5, 5–15, 15–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm. A total of 145 soil samples were collected from 30 profiles. The relationships between soil characteristics and environmental covariates were modeled using random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. We used a k-fold cross-validation to assess the quality of the predictions. The RF model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy for all three soil properties. The OC validation results for the RF model show that the R 2 value was between 0.80 and 0.98, the R 2 value for EC was between 0.74 and 0.98, and the R 2 value for pH was between 0.80 and 0.93. The channel network base level (CNBL) was found to be the most crucial covariate in predicting EC, while CNBL and vegetation indices were the most significant covariates in predicting OC. The covariates found to be crucial in predicting pH were the difference in vegetation index (DVI) and slope (S). The bootstrap method was used to compute the prediction uncertainty. The bootstrap method provided reliable estimates of uncertainties associated with these predictions. For all layers and all points, the coverage percentage for OC, EC, and pH was between 80 and 95% at the 95% confidence level. This shows the reliability of the estimated confidence limits. This study indicated that high pH and EC levels are associated with a reduction in soil OC percentage. To provide an accurate representation of OC distribution in any region, it is necessary to report not only an OC map but also maps of EC and pH, as the spatial interrelationship between soil properties highlights the need for estimating pH and EC for better understanding OC variability and soil functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it