MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386844587 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.13885

Tau in Atypical Parkinsonisms: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vivo <scp>PET</scp> Imaging Findings

2023· review· en· W4386844587 on OpenAlex
Anastassia M. Mena, Robert Chen, Ariel Graff‐Guerrero, Sarah L. Martin, Carme Uribe, Antonio P. Strafella

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoOntario Brain InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProgressive supranuclear palsyCorticobasal degenerationPet imagingMeta-analysisMedicineTau pathologyBinding potentialParkinson's diseaseBiomarkerNuclear medicineOncologyInternal medicinePositron emission tomographyPsychologyDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) are atypical parkinsonisms (APs) that are classified as tauopathies. Patients with these APs may present with similar early clinical manifestations to Parkinson's disease (PD), but they prove unresponsive to anti‐parkinsonian medications. Objective The main objective of this meta‐analysis was to compare first‐ and second‐generation tau PET tracer efficacy in patients with the APs to identify potential diagnostic biomarkers. Methods PubMed and Web of Science were searched between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2022. We included case–control studies that were published in English and report tau PET tracer binding as mean ± SD in at least one region of interest (ROI). Differences in tau PET binding values were meta‐analyzed using random‐effects meta‐analytic models and subgroup analyses based on ROIs in the statistical programming language R (version 4.2.1). Results Overall, 29 studies with 665 patients were included in the final review. [ 18 F]PI‐2620 outperformed first‐generation tracers when comparing PSP‐HC ( g = −1.68, 95% CI: −2.05 to −1.30) and CBD‐HC ( g = −1.37, 95% CI: −2.25 to −0.49). When comparing PSP‐PD, the first‐generation tracer, [ 18 F]AV‐1451, presented with higher binding to PSP patients ( g = −0.80, 95% CI: −1.24 to −0.35). Conclusions Our results demonstrate the efficacy of [ 18 F]PI‐2620 PET in imaging AP‐tau. These findings contribute towards identifying a diagnostic imaging biomarker for patients with APs. The main limitation of this study was the heterogeneity of the results. Future studies should conduct AP‐PD comparisons with second‐generation tracers to confirm the preliminary results found here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it