MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386857386 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347556

JWST’s PEARLS: Mothra, a new kaiju star at <i>z</i> = 2.091 extremely magnified by MACS0416, and implications for dark matter models

2023· article· en· W4386857386 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Diego, Bangzheng Sun, Haojing Yan, Lukas J. Furtak, Erik Zackrisson, Liang Dai, Patrick L. Kelly, M. Nonino, Nathan Adams, Ashish Kumar Meena, S. P. Willner, Adi Zitrin, Seth H. Cohen, Jordan C. J. D’Silva, Rolf A. Jansen, Jake Summers, Rogier A. Windhorst, Dan Coe, Christopher J. Conselice, Simon P. Driver, Brenda Frye, Norman A. Grogin, Anton M. Koekemoer, Madeline A. Marshall, Nor Pirzkal, A. S. G. Robotham, Michael J. Rutkowski, Russell E. Ryan, Scott Tompkins, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Rachana Bhatawdekar

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUnited States-Israel Binational Science FoundationAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónGoddard Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of PennsylvaniaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionSpace Telescope Science InstituteVetenskapsrådetSwedish National Space AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsDark matterAstronomyGalaxyDark matter haloGravitational microlensingDark galaxyGalaxy clusterHalo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the discovery of Mothra, an extremely magnified monster star, likely a binary system of two supergiant stars, in one of the strongly lensed galaxies behind the galaxy cluster MACS J0416.1−2403. Mothra is in a galaxy with spectroscopic redshift z = 2.091 in a portion of the galaxy that is parsecs away from the cluster caustic. The binary star is observed only on the side of the critical curve with negative parity but has been detectable for at least eight years, implying the presence of a small lensing perturber. Microlenses alone cannot explain the earlier observations of this object made with the Hubble Space Telescope. A larger perturber with a mass of at least 104 M⊙ offers a more satisfactory explanation. Based on the lack of perturbation on other nearby sources in the same arc, the maximum mass of the perturber is 2.5 × 106 M⊙, making this the smallest substructure constrained by lensing at z > 0.3. The existence of this millilens is fully consistent with expectations from standard cold dark matter cosmology. On the other hand, the existence of such a small substructure in a cluster environment has implications for other dark matter models. In particular, warm dark matter models with particle masses below 8.7 keV are excluded by our observations. Similarly, axion dark matter models are consistent with the observations only if the axion mass is in the range 0.5 × 10−22 eV < ma < 5 × 10−22 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207