Finding fault in a shear zone: a magnetic and drill core study in the Valentine Lake Property, Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Valentine Lake Property in southwestern Newfoundland has five known gold deposits over a distance of 20 km along a northeast to southwest trend and is expected to be the future site for the largest gold mine in Atlantic Canada. The property contains structurally controlled orogenic-type quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins, which are gold-bearing, occurring along or proximal to the Valentine Lake Shear Zone. The mineralization is found mostly on the northwest side of the shear zone in intrusive rocks and is rare in the conglomerate on the southeast side. The area has many mafic dykes, which show up well when conducting a magnetic survey due to their magnetite content. These dykes, like the mineralization, occur mainly in the intrusive rocks and trend predominantly subparallel to the shear zone, and so can help indicate structure. To constrain the location of the shear zone (and hence the mineralized region) in an area where an offset was suspected, a detailed magnetic survey was conducted over a 200 m x 300 m grid comprising sixteen lines. With the collected data, residual magnetic intensity maps were created and processed. A region was identified where the pattern of linear magnetic highs weaken and appear to terminate near the suspected offset. In combination with drill core information, this location is interpreted as a fault offset of the shear zone. The loss in magnetic intensity is possibly due to alteration or thinning of the mafic dykes near the fault.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".