MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386892351 · doi:10.17344/acsi.2023.8081

Monte Carlo Optimization Based QSAR Modeling of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists

2023· article· en· W4386892351 on OpenAlexaff
Nemanja Nikolić, Tomislav Kostić, Tamara Nikolić, Marija Marinković, Velimir Perić, Sara Mladenović, Aleksandar M. Veselinović

Bibliographic record

VenueActa chimica slovenica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
FundersMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
KeywordsQuantitative structure–activity relationshipAngiotensin IIAngiotensin receptorLosartanMonte Carlo methodMetric (unit)PharmacologyComputer scienceComputational biologyChemistryMathematicsStereochemistryMedicineReceptorBiologyStatisticsBiochemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pathogenesis of essential hypertension, congestive heart failure, and reno-vascular hypertension is related to angiotensin II. This study presents QSAR modeling for a set of compounds acting as angiotensin II receptor antagonists based on the Monte Carlo optimization with molecular graph-based and SMILES notation based descriptors. Conformation independent QSAR models were developed for three random splits. Various statistical approaches were used to assess the statistical quality of the developed models, and the obtained results were very good. This study used a novel statistical metric known as the index of ideality of correlation for the final assessment of the model, and the results that were obtained suggested that the model was good. Also, molecular fragments which account for the increases and/or decreases of a studied activity were defined and then used for the computer-aided design of new compounds as potential angiotensin II receptor antagonists. The final assessment of the designed inhibitors, was performed with the use of molecular docking studies, highlighting exceptional correlation with the QSAR modeling results. The methodology which is presented in this research can be applied for seeking new agents for cardiovascular disorders treatment by angiotensin II receptor antagonism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa chimica slovenicaSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207