MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386893191 · doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2023.150766

Involvement of Diverse Populations in Transfusion Medicine Research

2023· article· en· W4386893191 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yvette Marie Miller, Sara Bakhtary, Stella T. Chou, Benyam Hailu, Rita A. Reik, Raven Hardy Richard, Bryan R. Spencer, Rena Witherspoon, Meghan Delaney

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion Medicine Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthHoward UniversityUniversity of OttawaCanadian Blood ServicesJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsMentorshipInclusion (mineral)Openness to experienceHealth equityPsychological interventionSocioeconomic statusMedicinePublic relationsMedical educationPolitical sciencePsychologyNursingEnvironmental healthPublic healthPopulationSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.220
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.337
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2200.337
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.873
GPT teacher head0.669
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransfusion Medicine ReviewsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207