Application of herbal probiotics in feed on growth and blood profile of elver eels (Anguilla bicolor McClelland, 1844)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shortfin eel cultivation in Indonesia has shown significant development in aquaculture. However, various challenges still hinder its successful implementation. This study aims to investigate the impact of herbal probiotics on the growth and blood profile of elver eels (Anguilla bicolor). The research was conducted at UPR Mina Mandiri in the Beutong District of Nagan Raya Regency, from August to October 2022This research was conducted at UPR Mina Mandiri, Beutong District, Nagan Raya Regency, from August to October 2022. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with five treatment levels and three replications was employed for this study. The treatments consisted of herbal probiotics added to the eels' feed: 0, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ml/kg. The data obtained from the experiment were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the significance of the results. ANOVA test results show that probiotics significantly affect survival rate, absolute weight growth, specific weight rates, feed efficiency, and the elver eel blood profile (hemoglobin, erythrocytes, and leukocytes). (P0.05). Duncan's advanced test revealed significant differences in the growth parameters and blood profiles among the various treatments. Treatment B, which utilized a dosage of 15 ml/kg of feed, displayed the most favorable outcomes. It achieved a survival rate of 93.33%, absolute weight growth of 2.69 grams, a specific growth rate of 1.73%, and a feed efficiency of 48.56%. Additionally, the blood profile measurements for treatment B were as follows: hemoglobin levels ranged from 9.53 to 9.73 g/dl, erythrocyte count ranged from 1.12 to 1.23 x 103 cells/mm3, and leukocyte count ranged from 120 to 133 x 103 cells/mm3.Keywords:blood profilefish healthgrowthshortfin eels probiotics
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it