ORIGINAL ARTICLES: Macular hole repair: effect of size and nonsupine posture on postoperative outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Postoperative face-down positioning (FDP) for up to 2 weeks is believed to be necessary for successful closure of macular holes. FDP, however, can be disabling and uncomfortable and is a major burden for elderly patients. The aim of this study was to investigate how nonsupine posturing and macular hole size affect anatomical and functional success of macular hole closure. Methods: The medical records of patients with idiopathic macular holes who were treated surgically between 2016 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Exclusion criteria included vitreomacular traction, previous retinal detachment, or chronic macular hole. Results: A total of 115 eyes of 115 patients were included. Average age was 69.2 ± 8.2 years; 63 patients (55%) were female. Anatomical success was achieved in 108 patients (94%) with a single operation. In small holes (<400 μm), closure was seen in 98% of cases (95% CI, 94%-100%); in large holes (≥400 μm), 90% of cases (95% CI, 76%-94%). Visual acuity remained stable or improved in 108 patients (92%). Average preoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 1.02 ± 0.45, with an overall improvement of 5 lines postoperatively. Small holes and large holes improved, with an average of 3 versus 7 lines gained, respectively. Conclusions: In this study cohort, favorable anatomical and functional outcomes were achieved without postoperative FDP. These outcomes are comparable to the traditional FDP approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".