MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386901667 · doi:10.14283/jpad.2023.121

Longitudinal Evolution of Financial Capacity and Cerebral Tau and Amyloid Burden in Older Adults with Normal Cognition or Mild Cognitive Impairment

2023· article· en· W4386901667 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kayden J. Mimmack, Emily H. Sprague, Rebecca E. Amariglio, Patrizia Vannini, Gad A. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbBioClinicaU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsCognitionCognitive impairmentPsychologyAmyloid (mycology)DementiaMedicineNeuroscienceDiseaseInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Declining ability to independently perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) is a hallmark of early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Financial capacity, an aspect of IADL, includes financial skills such as balancing a checkbook and making change and is potentially sensitive to early decline in cognitive abilities, raising the question of how financial capacity is affected by buildup of cerebral tau and amyloid-hallmarks of AD pathology. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the relationship between cerebral tau, amyloid, and their interaction with change in financial capacity over time. DESIGN: Participants were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to have at least one yearly follow-up Financial Capacity Instrument-Short Form (FCI-SF) exam and a flortaucipir (tau) PET scan within 6 months of baseline (and in a subset, a florbetapir (amyloid) PET scan within a year of baseline). SETTING: Multi-center international cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Sample size was 507-322 cognitively normal (CN) and 185 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Sixty-two percent (N=316) had amyloid data. MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed-effects models predicted FCI-SF total score from baseline tau, age, gender, premorbid intelligence, executive function, memory, and the interaction of each with time. Regions of interest included inferior temporal, entorhinal cortex, precuneus, posterior cingulate, supramarginal, and dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF). Additional models examined amyloid and its interaction with tau. Results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Among the whole sample and in CN participants alone, higher baseline tau in all regions, most prominently in the inferior temporal, entorhinal cortex, and supramarginal regions, was significantly associated with worse performance on the FCI-SF over time. Among MCI participants alone, this relationship was significant in the entorhinal cortex (unstandardized b = 0.27, t = 3.71, adjusted p = 0.001), inferior temporal (b = 0.27, t = 3.96, p < 0.001), precuneus (b = 0.27, t = 3.04, p = 0.01), and supramarginal (b = 0.27, t = 2.74, p = 0.02) regions. Amyloid alone was significantly associated with worse FCI-SF performance in only the whole sample (b = 0.15, t = 2.37, p = 0.04), and a three-way interaction between tau, amyloid, and time was only present for entorhinal cortex tau in CN individuals (b = -1.61, t = -2.61, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Early tau accumulation is linked to worsening financial capacity over time in CN older adults and MCI. Declining financial capacity may signal pathological buildup and serve as an early warning sign for AD, and future research should continue to investigate the longitudinal relationship between tau, financial capacity, and other IADL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s DiseaseSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207