Modeling the Effect of the Platoon Size of CAVs on Mixed Traffic Flow: A Cellular Automaton Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a cellular automaton model incorporating the platoon size of connected automated vehicles (CAVs) to examine their impact on mixed traffic flow. First, vehicles are classified into three modes, human-driven vehicles (HDVs), adaptive cruise control (ACC), and cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), by considering the characteristics of the car-following behavior. Second, the CACC is further subdivided into interplatoon and intraplatoon car-following modes due to the limitations of the platoon size of CAVs. Then, cellular automaton rules are developed for each of these four modes. Finally, numerical simulation experiments are conducted to analyze the influence of the penetration rate and platoon size of CAVs on mixed traffic flow. The results demonstrate that (1) the simulation results closely align with the theoretically derived outcomes, with an error rate of only 0.46% at a penetration rate of 100%; (2) when the penetration rate of CAVs reaches 100%, increasing the platoon size further enhances the traffic capacity; and (3) the optimal platoon size is determined to be seven CAVs under moderate traffic density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".