MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386934050 · doi:10.7759/cureus.45652

Trends and Factors Associated With Mortality Rates of Leading Causes of Infant Death: A CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Database Analysis

2023· article· en· W4386934050 on OpenAlexaff
Okelue E Okobi, Ifreke U Ibanga, Uzoamaka C Egbujo, Thelma O Egbuchua, Kelechukwu P Oranu, Uchechukwu S Oranika

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital EdmontonSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfant mortalityMortality rateDemographyPediatricsBirth weightSudden infant death syndromeObservational studyPopulationPregnancyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Infant mortality is a critical indicator of a nation's healthcare system and social well-being. This study explores trends and factors associated with mortality rates for three leading causes of infant death: congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities; disorders related to short gestation and low birth weight, not elsewhere classified; and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). METHODS: Utilizing the CDC WONDER (CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database, we conducted a retrospective observational analysis of infant mortality rates and associated factors. Data encompassed multiple years, allowing for trend analysis and exploration of influencing variables. Study variables included demographic, maternal, prenatal, and leading cause as factors. RESULT: Trends in infant mortality rates varied across causes. The overall mortality rate was 2.69 per 1,000 (p=0.000) people during 2007-2020. The highest rates were observed in 2007 (3.05), 2008 (3.01), and 2009 (2.93) per 1,000 infants. For congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities, the rate ranged from 1.35 to 1.12 (2007-2020). Gender-based mortality differences were subtle (male rate 2.88 per 1,000 infants, p=0.000; female infants 2.50 per 1,000 infants, p=0.000). The examination of infant mortality trends also explored maternal variables, including maternal age, education, and delivery method. The analysis revealed disparities across variables. Teenage maternal age correlated with higher mortality rates, while maternal education was associated with lower rates. Vaginal delivery (2.61 per 1,000 infants, p=0.199) showed slightly lower rates compared to cesarean section (2.86 per 1,000 infants, p=0.076). CONCLUSION: This study utilizes the CDC WONDER database and offers evidence of changing trends in infant mortality rates for the selected causes. Factors such as maternal age (30-34 years and 35-39 years), race/ethnicity (Black or African-American and White), birthplace (in hospital), and mother's education (master's degree) were identified as influencing mortality rates. These findings contribute to informed policymaking and interventions aimed at mitigating infant mortality and improving the well-being of infants and their families. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying dynamics of these trends and factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.595
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.093 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207