Peculiarities of Organization and Efficiency of the Educational Process Under Martial Law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The object of the research is the objective reality of analysis and assessment of the sphere of the educational process in conditions of uncertainty and loss of control over this process. The subject of the research is the specificity of the organization and the level of effectiveness of the educational process in the conditions of the martial law of Ukraine. Theoretical framework: Many scientific works have been devoted to the problem of organizing the educational process in conditions of force majeure and armed conflict in particular, as well as to the derivative issues (Caplan, 2018), (Jennings, 2001), (Pet’ko, 2012, 2014, 2017, 2020), (Kotiak, 2011), (Lysenko, 2009), (Mazur, 2010), (Miniailova, 2022), (Morze, 2010), (Olshanska, 2016), (Prybylova, 2013), (Riabchun, 2021), (Sviezhentsev, 2015), (Skrypnyk, 2005), (Shevchuk, 2022), (Semenets-Orlova, 2022), (Akimova et. al., 2022). A study was conducted based on Ukrainian universities about distance education during the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic (Bakhov, I., Opolska, N., Bogus, M., Anishchenko, V. & Biryukova, Y., 2021), based on which it was proposed application of open and specialized geoinformation systems of education for students and postgraduates (Iatsyshyn, A., Iatsyshyn, A., Kovach, V., Zinovieva, I., Artemchuk, V., Popov, O., ... Turevych, A., 2020). Method: Researching the problems of the educational process under martial law is a rather specific activity and requires a specialized, non-traditional approach. This is due to numerous factors that are peculiar and relatively "new". Therefore, the methodological basis is the descriptive approach, which has the character of a description in revealing the regularities of the phenomenon, and the condition of the research is the laboratory approach. In general, the research is public and nationwide. And the main method is the method of non-formalized (traditional) analysis of documents directly related to education, and this is a qualitative method. Results and conclusion: In terms of the efficiency of school youth's acquisition of knowledge, the state of war undoubtedly significantly lowered the level. However, solely at the expense of valid teachers who remained in Ukraine and conducted classes in the region of unfavorable conditions and self-awareness of students in general, the effectiveness of teaching and the Ministry of Education and Culture only ensured the maintenance of such effectiveness. Implications of the research: The study's findings have several implications for the field of analysed issue. It emphasizes the importance of school youth's acquisition of knowledge, the state of war undoubtedly significantly lowered the level. This can help them develop the necessary skills and knowledge to handle various crisis situations effectively. Originality/value:This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by specifically focusing on organization and efficiency of the educational process under martial law. It offers insights into the practical aspects of the issue and provides valuable perspectives from both future specialists and their educators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".